4 July in the Land of the Free, the Mother of Parliaments and the Only Democracy in the ME, Part 2

Part 1, Part 3

I would like to start Part 2 with a lengthy excerpt from Paul Thorpe's open letter to those in Britain who had voted for Keir Starmer's Labour Party in the 4 July election, Labour voters - JUST WHY? It speaks for itself.

Have we come to terms with it yet? Have we come to terms with the fact that the United Kingdom has voted in a hard-left socialist Labour government? Bitter pill to swallow, in all honesty, isn't it.

Your new cabinet: Have you seen the state of Angela Rayner, Deputy P[rime] M[inister]? Boy, oh boy. What have we done? But if you're someone who's voted Labour, I've got some honest genuine questions for you that I really want to hear your answers to, because maybe I'm missing something. Maybe millions of people have missed something and maybe, as a Labour voter, you can tell us what we've missed.

What part of the following that I'm going to talk about do you, as a Labour voter, either agree with or approve of or both. Honest question, and I'm not being difficult. I'm not trying to cause an argument. I'm not trying to be funny or clever. I honestly want to hear your answers. I'm sure a lot of people do.

[...]

Illegal migration and legal immigration will absolutely explode under this Labour government, as if we haven't had enough people come to this country as it is. Now this is the perfect storm, isn't it, for migrants overseas wanting to come here. Marine Le Pen is about to be elected in France and I'm looking at the paper this morning. It says migrants in France are saying this is amazing news. We won't get sent to Rwanda. They're actually partying on the beach in France, because they're delighted at Keir Starmer's election victory. I'm just wondering what you Labour voters think of that? What part of that you think is going to benefit you and your families.

If the 17 million [pounds] a day we're already spending on the legal migrants coming into this country, housing them, etc., if that 17 million pounds isn't enough, then give it six or eight months, a year, you can probably double that; all money coming out of the taxpayer’s pocket. It won't be benefiting your family and it certainly won't be benefiting the future of your children. So I’m wondering, Labour voters, what part of that you actually think is a good idea. Did you realise what you were voting for?

And, of course, solving the illegal migrant issue won't be a problem for Labour. They will indeed solve it, and they'll solve it by making all these illegal migrants legal, and then they'll claim that they cut the illegal problem. Well, if you take the illegality away, then you do alleviate the problem, don't you? But it won't alleviate our towns and cities. It won't give us any more hospital beds or doctor's appointments that you currently can't get for yourselves, your families or your kids. So again, I'm wondering what part of that you thought, as a Labour voter, was a good idea. I'm genuinely baffled.

Blasphemy laws. Now we all know from Starmer's own chat with Sadiq Khan that he is going to tighten up on what he calls “hate speech”, in other words, criticism of any ideology or religion, well one in particular, at least, so if you even criticise [that] one particular religion or question some of its motives or its prehistoric beliefs, you're going to be guilty, potentially, of a hate crime. Again, I wonder what part of civilisation, of democracy you think's going to benefit from that and a certain community is already, within 48 hours of the election result, coming through one demographic in particular, already flexing their muscles and making their demands. Are you okay with that? Because you voted for it.

Our women and children are going to—unquestionably, unquestionably, there's no debate, there's no ifs or buts—your wives and your children your sisters, your moms, are all going to be, unquestionably, less safe on the streets of this country, with thousands and thousands more illegal migrants running around doing what they do. People brought to this country without any idea of how this country works, without believing in our system, our moral beliefs, our values, our cultural beliefs. Only recently, we saw a video where a hotel housing a lot of illegal migrants had to put a notice up in the hotel that you mustn't touch children. Are you happy with that? do you think that's going to benefit this country? Because you voted for it. I'm honestly interested to know what part of that made you think voting Labour was a good idea.

[...]

Free speech is going to be curtailed. There's no question of that either. Channels like this are going to be under threat, because we tell the truth. We ask questions. We might not always get it right, but at least we've got the right to ask them. That's going to be curtailed. Your choice of what you can hear, watch and listen to is going to be withdrawn, or at least, it's going to be tightened up.

[...]

Do you think that's the way forward for this country, and for our Jewish community here in the UK, our wonderful, peace-loving, very hardworking Jewish community in the UK? Well, their days are numbered, and it, let's be fair, I have a number of Jewish friends and associates, and I think every single one of them are now seriously considering if they have a future here in the United Kingdom. How can they, when it's very clear that anti-Semitism is going to be on the rise. This government are hellbent on clamping down on Islamophobia and anything that they deem to be Islamophobic. ...Keir Starmer has made it very clear in numerous speeches, one very recently, that Islamophobia is number one on his list, despite the fact that it's the Jewish community that have been under attack. You think it's going to get better or worse for them? We know the answer. Hence, a lot of these people will now be looking to leave the UK. A number of my Jewish friends have already left. They left under a Tory government and they've taken their very well-run businesses with them. People have lost their jobs because they no longer feel safe in this country. Think. Think about that for a minute if you voted Labour. Think about that.

But many of you probably don't care, because we all know that the Labour Party is absolutely rife with anti-Semitism. And never mind them papering over the cracks. We know how the Labour Party feel about the Jewish community. What part of you Labour voters thought it was a good idea to elect people like Angela Rayner, David Lammy, Wes Streeting. All have records of cozying up to a certain religion, and in at least one case, have made serious Anglophobe comments in the past. How are they possibly going to benefit your family? Are you pleased with that? If you voted Labour, mark my words, that is what you've done. You voted for your kids to go to the back of the queue, because that is where they will be if they aren't already there.

You voted for a party that has a very long track record of protecting those guilty of grooming our children.[1] You voted for a party that's protected those people in the name of diversity and community cohesion. I wonder how you feel about that. This is indisputable: Rotherham, Telford, it goes on and on. Labour Councillors, Labour ethos, Labour policy. That's what you voted for. I want to know what part of protecting child grooming gangs made you decide to vote for Labour. I'm really interested to know.

[...]

You voted for a party that pretty much, without saying it, supports Hamas. They might not admit to it, but a lot of people within the Labour Party do. Hamas, a proscribed terrorist organisation, how much longer there'll be a proscribed terrorist organisation here in the UK under Labour, is questionable. You happy with that? Did you vote for that? Did you understand what you were voting for?

[…]

I don't believe that the British people are actually that sadistic, but I do believe politically, the British people are very, very naïve and, in a lot of cases, very stupid. Maybe it will take five years of Hell to wake the rest of you up, to wake you Labour voters up, as to what you've done.

[...]

What this Labour government are going to do to, and what they're going to impose upon all of us, is very, very frightening indeed. Make no mistake, we have elected the most Anglophobe government in history, and I wouldn't be surprised at whatever they do to put their jack boot on top of our heads to push us further into the ground to make sure that our voices are null and void.

“If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—for ever.”

Paul Thorpe is of the same working class stock as Tommy Robinson. If anything positive is come out of the 4 July election, it is the re-emergence of Tommy Robinson and the emergence of many more people like them, brave enough so say exactly what needs to be said and unencumbered by received perceptions of the world.

The election of Keir Starmer as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom is more catastrophic than many are at present able to see. Drawing attention to the following critical detail might help. Muslims in Britain had orchestrated a bold plan to blackmail Parliament through the ballot box by riding on Keir Starmer's election campaign. It worked before, when they blackmailed Theresa May's government into denying asylum to Asia Bibi with the mere threat of a threat.

Through a new organisation, The Muslim Vote, Muslims coordinated their effort, and gained a further four Members of Parliament. So far, it all sounds pretty innocuous. It might not even be all that alarming that there is now more than a handful of people in the House of Commons who do not see what all the fuss over 7 October is about and believe that democracy can go to Hell. After all, there are plenty such people in the Knesset. Add to this Keir Starmer's open intention to criminalise "Islamophobia" and you have the makings of a perfect storm for legally, non-violently making Shari'a the law of the land in Britain. “This story got every single hair on my journalistic neck standing on end,” admitted Alex Phillips of Talk TV, opening her interview with Charlotte Littlewood on the blackmail organisation, The Muslim Vote, and its role in the 4 July UK elections.

There is still, tragically, even at this eleventh hour, the presumption that Muslim lawmakers in Western legislatures are basically the same type of people as any other legislators. In a superficial sense, this is true, but that is where the similarity ends. Their constituencies are not the geographical delineations of their electoral seat. They do not represent non-Muslims, even if they have their votes. They all have the same one constituency: the entire ummah, wherever in the world they may be. When it comes down to it, Muslim legislators could not care less about streetlights, healthcare or the price of petrol at the pump, unless it directly impacts Muslims. But they will be outraged about a Christian robbing a Muslim shopkeeper in the Philippines, and demand the British, Australian or Canadian Parliament do something about it, or else. They will be deeply hurt if such a concern is not taken seriously, and will tell you that 1.4 billion Muslims are offended, and mean it.

As we know from the record of an infamous Somali immigrant to the United States, or from a Senator in Western Australia, it takes only one Muslim to seriously compromise the integrity and functioning of a Western democratic institution. Troubling as an accretion of such Muslims on the benches of the House of Commons might be, the real alarm is not the number who were elected, but the number of candidates that Muslims had managed to put up in this election, and this is the same election in which the Stalinist Labour Party was poised to win by a landslide and outlaw "Islamophobia". Muslims fielded over seventy candidates, more than 40 through the Workers Party of Britain (George Galloway’s party) and more than 30 as so-called “independents” (this is not counting the Trojan Horses inside the mainstream parties). The "independents" were coordinated through The Muslim Vote.

The Muslim Vote is not just a campaign organisation or even a pressure group. It is an extortion racket. You do as we say or we bring you down. "The Muslim Vote (TMV) is a nationwide group attempting to coordinate voters to punish candidates that they believe have not been sufficiently supportive of Palestine at the ballot box," reported The Telegraph. The group had the affront to issue a list of demands to the Labour Party and no one dared to put them in their place.

The Muslim Vote’s list of demands is below:

1. Apologise for your comments greenlighting a genocide and for not backing the ceasefire in Oct/Nov 2023

2. Sanctions on companies operating in occupied territories. Sanctions on settlers

3. Recognise Palestine as a state

4. Travel ban on all Israeli politicians that prosecuted this war and support the illegal occupation

5. End military ties with Israel

6. Issue guidance that Muslims are allowed to pray at school

7. Implement findings of people’s review of Prevent — not Shawcross

8. Remove the extremism definition that [Michael] Gove introduced

9. Commit to full implementation of Royal Charter re media regulation

10. Adopt the APPG definition of Islamophobia

11. Commit to a review of public sector equality duty

12. Increase council and public health funding for the 10 per cent most deprived areas in the country to finally address systemic and chronic health inequities as detailed in the Marmot Review and revisited by the Health Foundation 10 years later

13. Deliver alternative student finance

14. Ensure Sharia-compliant pensions are available at every workplace, so the one-third of Muslims without a pension get one

15. Ensure insurance quotes don’t cost more for someone called “Muhammad”

16. Commit 7 per cent of the local government pension scheme/public sector pensions to ethical and Islamic funds

17. Oppose Boycott, Divestment and Sanction (BDS) bill. Kick it out of law

18. Remove the archaic “spiritual influence” offence from statute[3]

They add, "There is more but that’ll do for starters." Of course there is more. Who would be foolish enough to think that there is not?

These eighteen "starter" demands are ostensibly a response to the Labour Party's pro-Israel stance on the Israel-Gaza War, but only the first five demands have anything as all to do with Israel, of which only two are directly related to the Israel-Gaza War. Labour, still reeling from the anti-Semitism scandal, has fences to mend, towards which substituting Starmer for Corbyn was one step. Its stance on the war is another. Muslims are there to advance Islam, not to do diplomatic dances, and everything is a vehicle for advancing Islam. Thirteen of the eighteen demands (72%+) have nothing whatsoever to do with Israel, and everything to do with jihad and Shari'a. One could write an entire article on these eighteen demands, but now is not the time. The document is a testament to brazen Muslim supremacism and arrogance. It is also a Declaration of War, for whether you comply with the ultimatum or not, they are going to move against you anyway.

Charlotte Littlewood explains:

I think the Muslim vote is supported by a wide plethora of organisations, so we cannot define it as one thing, but we can see that some of the supporters are very troubling and the activity of The Muslim Vote suggests that this is a Muslim Brotherhood strategy. So the Muslim Association of Britain backs the Muslim Vote. This is who Michael Gove has said is essentially the British affiliate of the Muslim Brotherhood, and we have Mend which has just been exposed as on the list of extremist organisations that Labour must now distance itself from, and has agreed to distance itself from. So these backers are very troubling.

Then, when you look at the activities of The Muslim Vote, that indeed, they're trying to create an ethnic voting block that will bring about Islamic interests in the UK. And we look at what the Muslim Brotherhood aims to do, which is to bring Islam to the global fore, to create a global caliphate through democratic non-violent means, in the main.

[Yusuf al-]Qaradawi, the key ideologue of the Muslim Brotherhood, says, not through the sword, but through ideology, and points towards voting and creating a global Muslim Brotherhood that focuses on key issues, indeed, like Palestine. Therefore it's no surprise that Hamas is actually the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. So it's all linked-up, which is why we see so much of a Palestine focus.

They will be putting up candidates in every by-election between now and the next election, and not only to win those seats, but to refine strategy. They are “non-violent in the main,” says Littlewood. Mark that. Today they harass, intimidate, slash tyres and torch offices. These are not people who will prepare patiently to try again at the next election. If an opportunity presents itself, through the application of some judicious violence, to seize power, they will. Their man in the Prime Minister’s Office is well familiar with the slogan, “All power to the Soviets!” and the circumstances surrounding its creation.

If you look at what The Muslim Vote has said in the last 24 hours, they're absolutely gearing up for this to be the beginning, not the end, and they’re looking at how some of their candidates didn't win, because they were competing against other candidates of the same ilk, and they're looking at how they can strategise differently for the next elections. I think that they will become emboldened and more coordinated, but this is very much a really long-term plan that comes from the time of Qaradawi, Hassan al-Banna and the beginning of the Muslim Brotherhood [the late 1920s, AP]. Now we're just seeing the effect of the manifestation of that here in the UK and in other countries in Europe. They have a specific plan for the West and that is what is being realised.

These Muslims let loose upon the world are distinct from the Muslims trying to pursue peaceful lives in the West. I say “trying”, because they continue to call themselves Muslim, and as such, they signal their presence to the Muslims who are in the West to destroy the society and need those democratic Muslims to take up their assigned roles as Muslims in the cause of Allah. The matter is not negotiable. Littlewood understand that better than most non-Muslim analysts:

It's important to say that we do have Muslim candidates, like Shabana Mahmood, who's talked about how there is a crisis of democracy here, and how we've seen this election play out. She had masked men come to one of her community meetings and terrify her campaign team. So we’re going to see, as well, fissures within the Muslim communities, who will be able to see this for what it is. There will be candidates that you've spoken about. There's five candidates, independents, that have won. Not all of them will be clearly linked to these organisations, but they are meeting out the strategy of the Muslim Brotherhood, whether they're aware of it or not, by speaking just for Muslims. Trying to bring about a situation which is more for Muslims than for any other community in the UK is the beginning, the gradual way, of bringing about what the Muslim Brotherhood wants as a fraternal participationist organisation.

This is a distinction that I’ve taken great pains to get across to so many different audiences over the years, always without success. Like the interviewer, Alex Phillips[2], most Western people seem unable to get past:

Without being libellous against any of these people – I don't know them personally; I don't know their motivations, these independent candidates; I don't know whether they are related to any of the organisations that we are talking about. So we've got to be very careful about what we say or how we deal with this.

Such delicacy is misplaced, because in non-Muslim countries, the House of War, Muslims are not individuals. They are party to a common cause, even if they don’t know it, or don’t intend it. The masked men turned up at Shabana Mahmood’s meeting because she is Muslim. While she remains Muslim, they will always have a claim on her. You cannot say you are a Muslim, but then opt out of the ummah’s entitlement over you. That’s not how being Muslim works.

Britons are finally waking up to da’wah, but it might already be too late. Of those who did not vote Labour, many are both bold and effective in challenging Muslims,[2] putting jihad of the tongue under severe pressure. The genie of Islam’s indefensibility is out of the bottle and Muslim hubris coming up against its nemesis is now a running joke. The many Muslims making a concerted effort to win public office, will expose themselves to high-profile public humiliation when they push their da’wah in Parliament. Since they are there for no other purpose but to advance Islam, their presence in the House necessitates the criminalisation of “Islamophobia”, and Keir Starmer, as he promised Sadiq Khan a few weeks ago, is more than ready to oblige. So what can we say about these new Muslim MPs?

Alex Phillips reports that, “In Leicester South, Shockat Adam declared “This is for Gaza,” as he won the seat by 979 votes. The constituency [has] around 30% Muslim electorate.” Charlotte Littlewood further fleshes out what we can expect from our new Honourable Members:

You've got Shockut Adam, who is actually associated with, and was a former chairman for, Mend [Muslim Engagement and Development, a private thought-police on the lookout for “Islamophobia”, AP], which is on the extremist list, which is now being separated from its links with Labour. So that's really concerning. He's fundraised for Mend as well. Then you have another one of the candidates, Ayoub Khan, who had to leave the liberal Democrat Party, because of questioning the validity of October 7^th and then refusing anti-Semitism training. Across the board there were shouts of “From the river to the sea.” You had Adnan Hussain, the successful candidate for Blackburn, saying, “We will continue to fight until death, insha-Allah”, “From the river to the sea.” And then the intimidation of the electorate into voting for them. So you have again Iqbal Mohamed (Dewsbury and Batley), saying that you throw Zionists out, even from your own homes. So there is this idea that you have to police your own home for pro-Israel stance or Zionism.

For the first time since the establishment of the Mother of Parliaments, there will now be Members of Parliament whose words it will be a criminal offence to challenge. Let that one sink in…

But it's not only jihad of the tongue that now gets immunity even inside Parliament, jihad of the sword, likewise, becomes immune from prosecution, because someone is going to have to accuse a Muslim of having done it and accusing a Muslim of anything, which is already "Islamophobia," will now also, therefore, be a crime. According to the Islamic law manual, Reliance of the Traveller, Shari'a offers immunity from prosecution for the following:

The following are not subject to retaliation:

(2) a Muslim for killing a non-Muslim;

(3) a Jewish or Christian subject of the Islamic state [You have to be a dhimmi to qualify for this indemnity, AP] for killing an apostate from Islam, because a subject of the state is under its protection [from (2), above, AP] while killing an apostate from Islam is without consequences;

(4) a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring's offspring;

(5) nor is retaliation permissible to a descendant for killing someone whose death would otherwise entitle the descendant to retaliate, such as when his father kills his mother. (Reliance of the Traveller, Book O1.2)

For the people who will now be given free rein not only on British streets, but inside your house, killing is quite the norm. For them, it is only a matter of whether or not Shari'a permits it. In Shari'a, there is no concept of rape. Whether in Afghanistan or the UK, Germany or the United States, Sweden or Australia, wherever Islam advances, it is always the women who become the prey. All of this, and much worse besides, is Shari'a, and becomes the law of the land the moment a prohibition on "Islamophobia" becomes the law of the land. The British, by free and secret ballot, put at the head of their government a man who both knows this and wants this. Keir Starmer is whom they voted for; Shari'a is what they're getting. This is what 4 July 2024 will come to mean for the land that gave the world the Mother of Parliaments.

Notes:

1. "Grooming gangs" is the British euphemism for Muslim rape gangs. It is also a reference to the epidemic of Muslim gang rapes and the scandal surrounding it. Even this useless term had to be fought for, because the term "Muslim" had to be kept as far away as possible from the term "rape". When the epidemic first became wide public knowledge (Muslims, of course, knew about it all along, but none of them ever reported it; funny, that), politicians, the authorities and the media, since they now had to describe it, called the rapists "Asian". This drew a sharp backlash for obvious reasons, and they were then called "Pakistani". Asia Bibi is Pakistani, but Christian. It is inconceivable that Asia Bibi's sons could ever be involved in gang-rape. The objections were loud. So what do we do now? We couldn't possible get more specific than that. So, without ever saying who does it, "rape" became "grooming", the final kick in the face for the women and girls who fall victim to this horrific practice. Those Muslim gangs do not exist to groom; they exist to rape. If it were merely about grooming, the victims would not get raped. If the Muslims could dispense with the grooming, they would for straight for the rape. What could possibly be more offensive than to remind these victims of gang-rape that "not all Muslims do this"?
2. Just before publishing the delayed Part 2, I came across this remarkable video. This is power, and it's not before time. Unfortunately it was too late to incorporate it into the text.
3. Archie Mitchell, "Muslim group issues 18 demands for Keir Starmer to win back voters lost over Gaza," The Independent, 7 May 2024, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labour-keir-starmer-muslim-gaza-israel-palestine-b2540759.html

Picture credits:

Branch of the National Union of Journalists (BNUJ). - https://web.archive.org/web/20080608013945/http://www.netcharles.com/orwell/pics/orwell-unioncard.htm, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2001660

Nizzan Cohen - Own work, CC BY 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=139513808

Comments:

On 9 July 2024 at 7:07, Ben Dor A. wrote:

Dear Anjuli Pandavar

Thank you for highlighting the catastrophe in the UK.

Now look at what just happened in France: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c51ygevlylvo

This is crazy. Eurabia is solidified.

Best Regards
Ben Dor A

On 9 July 2024 at 9:29, Anjuli Pandavar wrote:

It just got a whole lot worse, I'm afraid. Keir Starmer is proposing to devolve aspects of British foreign policy to local governments. That is exactly the level at which jihad and the imposition of Shari'a is organised. Remember this: "Hamtramck, Michigan, a city of roughly 30,000, now under complete Muslim control and stepping up the substitution of Shari’a for civilised law"?

The man is in a bind: he doesn't want the whole anti-Semitism scandal that shook the Labour Party and toppled its leader to be visited upon him, so he has to mend fences with British Jews, but he can't risk cosying up to them too much for fear of alienating even more Muslims at the local level. Solution: let local governments decide and implement their own Middle East policies!

How many local Jewish businesses do you think are going to survive that? How many synagogues are going to find their garbage not being collected? How many Jewish parents are going to find they can no longer drop their children off within a Kilometre of a Jewish school (for the school's protection, you understand), forcing them to run the gauntlet of Jew-haters twice a day, every day, unless they turn their schools in prison compounds? What kind of books will now be removed from all libraries, what remains of them, and what kind of books will replace them? Never mind the next election; Muslims will immediately start intimidating, threatening, blackmailing and assaulting their way to power. "All power to the Soviets!"