“It’s not my fault you’re a Muslim.” The weapon you might soon need

If you are not a Muslim and you still have what you believe is your Muslim friend, then the question at the back of your mind had better be, “What will happen if my Muslim friend knows that Muslims are coming to kill me?” Will your friend:

1. Call you to warn you / alert the police / take you to safety?
2. Say nothing and let you be killed?
3. Tell the killers where you are / ensure that you are there at the time?
4. Join them in killing you?

History is littered with stories of non-Muslims families who have had good Muslim neighbours for decades, even generations, only to find one fine day those good neighbours crashing into their homes and slaughtering them. It is behaviour so shocking to civilised people that, despite its regular occurrence, we put it out of our minds as a freak event, an aberration that could not possible hold true as a rule.

In the most recent such case, the Palestinian Arab massacre of Israelis on October 7, it was the very Jews most committed to friendship and coexistence with Muslims, pointedly taking up residence right next to Muslims so as to be able to help them, including ferrying them to hospital and welcoming them into their homes, who got slaughtered. Most Western people, including Israelis, have already forgotten this. If they remember anything at all, it is how these savage, ungrateful Muslims repaid their generosity and friendship.

But the Jews’ friendship and help were unsolicited. They foisted their friendship and help onto those Muslims, who took advantage of friendship while it was available to plot the massacre of those "friends". From a very young age, Islam mandates that Muslim children be taught never to befriend Christians and Jews, unless in order to deceive them.

Let not the believers take unbelievers for their friends in preference to believers. Whoever does that has no connection with Allah unless you are guarding yourselves against them, taking security. Allah bids you to beware of him. To Allah is the journeying. (Qur’an 3:28. Emphasis added)

Hate them all, even as you smile at them. Ibn Kathir, in his exegesis of Qur’an 3:28, makes clear that Muslims who fear the kufaar might suspect Muslims of nefarious intentions:

...Are allowed to show friendship to the disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly. For instance, Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda' said, “We smile in the face of some people, although our hearts curse them.” Al-Bukhari said that Al-Hasan said, “The Taqiyya is allowed until the Day of Resurrection, (Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 3:28)

And what nefarious intentions? A Muslim, by legal definition, is someone permanently at war with non-Muslims to advance the cause of Allah, namely, jihad, to subjugate the entire world under Islam. In other words, without jihad, there are no Muslims. If you still have a Muslim friend, you might object that not all Muslims want to wage war on you; many do not even believe is that. Unfortunately for you, the architects of Islam have already thought of that and are well ahead of you. Specifically addressing what you might prefer to call “the moderates,” the Qur’an says:

Warfare is commanded for you, even though it is odious for you, but it may happen that you hate something that is good for you, and it may happen that you love something that is bad for you. Allah knows, you do not know. (2:216)

Here the Qur’an distinguishes between two kinds of Muslims: those who hate killing; and those who revel in it, referred to elsewhere as, “those who sit still; and those who give their blood and their wealth for Allah”. The Muslims you believe are your friends are the ones who sit still, but Islam does not let them go to waste. Their jihad role is to do da’wah, show you how wonderful Islam is, and invite you to accept Islam. Why is it their job to do da’wah? Because their da’wah is meant to reassure you that Islam is not what is practised by those “extremists/Islamists/radicals/jihadists,” as you call them. By convincing you of the goodness of “their interpretation” or “their version” of Islam, your Muslim friends disarm you, and make it easier for “the Islamists,” the ones who give their blood and their wealth for Allah, to infiltrate your society, prepare their attacks, and strike.

These two temperaments of Muslims constitute two sides of the jihad coin. Note: there is no such thing as an anti-jihad Muslim. The peaceful ones, furthermore, conceal the violent ones, feed them, give them a bed, drive them to the killing site, point out the Jews, Christians, Hindus, etc., their homes, businesses, cars, and so forth. And if the “moderate Muslim” happens to be in some kind of life crisis, for instance, divorce, debt or depression, then their “extremist” imam or sheikh will remind them of how they strayed from the path to fraternise with the kufaar. Then the least they can do to repent is by killing, and, like the people in the Gaza envelope, their easiest target will be you. Every Muslim is a Muslim.

Those of the believers who sit still, other than those who have an injury, are not equal with those who wage jihad in the way of Allah with their wealth and lives. Allah has conferred on those who wage jihad with their wealth and lives a rank above the sedentary. Allah has promised good to each, but he has bestowed on those who wage jihad a great reward above that of the sedentary, (4:95)

In short, the Muslim default is to kill you. Your Muslim friend is never your friend, even if he helps you.

The non-Muslim reader who finds the last statement extreme, mean-spirited, uncompromising, or even repulsive, shows that he or she is a good-hearted human being. Such reactions stem from admirable, civilised qualities that should be the default for all of us. They are not, as Qur'an 4:95 shows, the default for Muslims. The default for Muslims is to love killing, to revel in it, to make selfies of it and to celebrate it in streets and squares around the world.

When Al-Qaïda and ISIS were ravaging the world, the “moderates” launched into major damage-limitation to protect Islam, desperate to convince the non-Muslims, the kufaar, that the Muslim mass-murderers were not real Muslims, and that what they did was not Islam. Some called them fanatics, others called them “bad apples”—how quaint. It suited those of us who lack the stomach for unpalatable reality to embrace that narrative. But essentially, they’d been caught by surprise, and had no choice but to respond tactically, rather than strategically.

Islam was never going to subjugate the West by war. Jihad, however, is an imperative without which Islam is not Islam. Muslims have to find a way. The Nazis and the KGB offered a way out: global organisation and ideological subversion. In the Muslim Brotherhood, we find the combination of jihad, Nazism and the Comintern.

The last hundred years has seen the ideology of Western people raised in freedom subverted step by slow step, through counter-culture, dumbing-down, postmodernism, “critical theory”, self-loathing, antipathy towards Western civilisation, political correctness, multiculturalism, identity politics, “intersectionality”, diversity-equity-inclusion, “virtue-signalling”, “micro-aggressions”, wokeness and cancel culture, and simultaneously transformed into hearing and obeying, enmity and disavowal, enjoining the right and forbidding the wrong, loyalty equals truth and hair-trigger ostracisation. In other words, free, autonomous individuals have been reduced to the kinds of people that Muslims create in madrassas, ready to act like Muslims who receive their orders from pulpits on Fridays.

An early indication of how far this ideological subversion has gone and how successful it has been was the 2016-2017 overnight transformation of Aung San Suu Kyi from darling of the pro-democracy world for standing up to a brutal junta, to global pariah for daring to confront the Rohingya Muslim insurgency in her country. By the time the Arab Muslims of Gaza went on the slaughter in Israel in 2023, the Western mind was receptive to claims starvation, the killing of women and children and genocide, and to obey by taking to the streets against Jews and Israel in defence of “Palestinians”.

Only one more step remains in this century-long Islamic takeover of the West: mass Western conversion to Islam. After ninety-seven years of meticulous jihad and da’wah, Muslims have come too close to the prize to lose it all now, and over the last two years, the chance of losing it all has increased alarmingly. Yahya Sinwar jumped the gun, giving Israelis time to wake up before they could be destroyed. Britain elected a pathetic, sycophantic Prime Minister openly in thrall to Muslims exactly when Britons finally realised that paedophilia is worse than “Islamophobia”. In the US, within the span of one week: Somali immigrants were exposed for extracting collective jizya from the Treasury to fund jihad in Somalia; an Afghan immigrant in Washington DC shot dead one soldier and seriously wounded another; and President Trump at last undertook to ban the Muslim Brotherhood (this is Trump; he could backtrack). It was a combination of international and domestic alarms that finally woke up the US population. All these Western populations suddenly propelled into action means things are not going as well for Islam is it should be this late in the jihad.

And as with Al-Qaïda and ISIS earlier in the century, Muslims are again going into damage-limitation overdrive, only this time, the defence of Islam is centrally-orchestrated, rather than left to beleaguered “moderate Muslims” each pleading on their own that “Islam means peace”. Islamic totalitarian infrastructure is now in place at strategic points across the Western world:

1. Legally-nonsensical “Islamophobia” can now be legally prosecuted, the basis for arbitrary role, as opposed to the rule of law
2. Significant areas of large cities, e.g., London, Paris, Stockholm, Berlin, etc., have de facto seceded from their nation-states to become Islamic micro-states, while others such as Dearborn, Hamtramck, Minneapolis and the Dallas periphery are well on their way to de facto secession from the United States
3. Western populations sympathetic towards Muslims, i.e., to their own subjugation, now extends across three generations
4. The Western media and academic and political institutions are under Muslim ideological control, or at least contested
5. Prisons have become jihad recruitment and training grounds, completely subverting imprisonment for terrorism
6. Mosques and Islamic centres, i.e., military operations centres and forward bases, exist in almost every city and town
7. Millions of fighting age men have invaded Western Europe, Australia and North America, their arms ready to be collected from secret stashes all over.

Unlike with Al-Qaïda and ISIS earlier in the century, the “moderates” no longer have to turn on their own brethren as “not proper Muslims,” taqiyya as that might have been. They can now turn on “Islamophobes,” since Muslims now control the past. Muslims never fail to mention “the genocide in Gaza,” even though no such thing ever took place, or “the photos of starving kids,” even though all photos purporting to show starving children in Gaza have been shown to be either fake or showing something entirely different. To control the past is to control the present, and to control the present is to control the mind. And the Western mind is rapidly coming under the heel of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Interestingly, in the week prior to the Minnesota jizya exposure and the jihad attack on the National Guard in the US capital, the Muslim Brotherhood, through its American arm, CAIR, held a webinar titled, “The Distraction Game: Why Israel's Supporters Are Stoking Anti-Muslim Hysteria Across the West”, in which four “thinking Muslims” (that’s actually a thing), in a masterful piece of Orwellian double-speak, invite their viewers to:

Join experts for an urgent conversation about this coordinated disinformation effort, how it spreads, and what communities can do to counter hate and defend free speech, democracy, and human rights.

This “defence of free speech, democracy, and human rights,” turned out to be nothing but an attempt to leverage “the genocide in Gaza” to boost “Islamophobia” into an axiom, thereby obviating the offensive need to split Islam into “Islam” versus “Islamism” and Muslims into “Muslims” versus “Islamists”. The ones to blame for the horrors that Muslims perpetrate are no longer “not real Muslims,” but “Islamophobes”. Needless to say, the Shari’a compulsion to only ever put Islam and Muslims in a good light fetters our four “experts” with all the usual logical fallacies characteristic of da’wah. Their Muslim audience will, of course, agree with them, partly because they are incapable of seeing such fallacies, and partly because they are obligated to only ever hear and obey. But not everyone who saw the webinar was a Muslim.

Western non-Muslims might now start finding themselves under concerted pressure from Islamic apologists and woke useful idiots to prove that they are not “Islamophobic”. The key here is for non-Muslims to avoid falling into the Israeli trap of explaining that we are not “Islamophobic,” but instead to go on the psychological offensive. If anyone should challenge you for what you are doing to combat “Islamophobia,” and you have time, use the following:

In the West, we live in a society that affords us freedom of religion. It is up to each to choose which religion we adhere to, if any. Equally, we are free to not exercise that right and simply continue with the religion we grew up in. If you choose any religion other than Islam, you will generally have no problem, except from Muslims. But if you choose to remain or become a Muslim, you have to be aware of the following:

It is Muslims who perpetrated the jihad mass-murder of 3,000 people in New York on 11 September 2001. Muslims killed 334 people, including 186 schoolchildren, in Beslan, Russia, on 1-2 September 2004. It is Muslims who committed jihad mass-murder in London on 7 July 2005 and Muslims who killed twelve people at the Charlie Hebdo offices in Paris on 7 January 2015. Muslims broke through the border into Israel on 7 October 2023 and massacred over 1,200 people in a frenzy of rape, mutilation, dismemberment and immolation, and Muslims who celebrated the massacre around the globe as their “moment of triumph”. The total number of jihad attacks carried out by Muslims between 9/11 and time of writing was 48,655, resulting in 314,496 killings and 378,659 unsuccessful killing attempts, according to figures we compiled from the Religion of Peace database.

If you are a Muslim in the West and choose to remain associated with the people who did and continue to do those deeds by adhering to their religion, then you will, quite naturally, be associated with their deeds, no matter what adjective you append before “Muslim,” not to mention that because you insist on being a Muslim, Islam will always have a claim on you and might call in that claim at any moment. You are, therefore, by definition, a threat. Civilised parents teach their children not to fall into bad company. They do not tell them to be careful never to alienate the good ones within the bad company. And by all accounts, Muslims are very bad company, indeed.

If you happen not to be a killer yourself, then your fellow Muslims are laying one Hell of a burden on you. I am not interested in lightening that burden for you. Do not expect me to lie about, obfuscate or diminish either the culpability of Muslims or the evil of Islam. I will not speak about “Islamists” or “Islamism” so you might feel less uncomfortable about your cowardice. You and your religion are quite rationally feared and avoided. If you elicit such responses, only you are responsible for it. So you know what you can do with your “Islamophobia”.

That is how non-Muslims can go on the psychological offensive if they have time to respond at length to demands for what they are doing to fight “Islamophobia”. If it were me, I would not indulge Muslims, but simply say, “It’s not my fault you’re a Muslim. P*ss off!”

Picture credit:

Screenshot from CAIR - Council on American Islamic Relations video.